Save Our Sidmouth


Leave a comment

SOS update

SOS Committee, (Richard Thurlow, (Sid Vale Association),Chair; Alan Darrant (SVA); Steven Kendall-Torry; (Chamber of Commerce) ; Richard Eley, (CoC); Barry Curwen, (CoC) , Robert Crick, (Futures Forum); Jeremy Woodward, (FF); James Sharp, (Sidmouth Hospitality Association) HA), Kelvin Dent, (Knowle Residents’ Association), Matt Booth, (Drill Hall Campaign), Marianne Rixon, (Sidford Womens’ Institute), and Jackie Green,(Publicity) meet at irregular but frequent intervals to discuss issues affecting the Sid Vale.

Our two main concerns are the Knowle and the Local Plan.

The Knowle.

Following the rejection of the Outline Planning Application  for the Knowle at the Development management Committee, an open letter from SOS to East Devon District Council  was published in the Sidmouth Herald. This contained many questions to EDDC on the Knowle situation. It was sent also to each EDDC councillor.

EDDC replied to the members of SOS committee, (attached), and EDDC also published a letter supposedly answering SOS questions in the Herald.  The response was typically spin, neither directly answering or explaining their intentions in any detail.

SOS resolved to respond to EDDC by asking for further clarification.

EDDC are now in a quandary of their own making. The Knowle allocation of 50 houses is also contained in the draft Local Plan (LP). What do they do? Leave the Knowle in the LP and wait for the Inspector to decide? Resubmit a revised OPA at considerable extra cost? Relinquish any attempt to redevelop the Knowle?

If only EDDC had, at the beginning of this sorry and expensive saga, made clear the problems they say they are experiencing at their HQ, and invited groups of interested organisations to discuss options with them to seek a mutually satisfactory way forward, then much cost, anguish, and embarrassment might have been saved.

But EDDC in their usual, “we know what is best”, secretive, arrogant way,  decided to go ahead without any public involvement.

The Local Plan

Following the end of the Consultation/Representation period on the 14th January 2013, we understand that EDDC are compiling the Representations and expect to have completed this by the end of May 2013.

A report will then be prepared which will be sent to the Development Management Committee. This presumably will explain any changes to the Draft LP that the Planning Policy Team have made.

The CEO has said, (Scrutiny Committee meeting on the 28th March), that he expects only minor, (ie grammatical), changes. We have asked him to clarify this statement.

The LP is then sent to the Secretary of State, for him to appoint an Inspector to examine the Local Plan publicly.  The original intention was for this to happen in mid summer, with the LP, (amended or as drafted), made in early 2014. However the current progress clearly prevents this, and we believe that the Public Examination will not occur until early next year, 2014.

This clearly has implications for East Devon, since the current LP expired on March 27th 2013, and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)  now has precedence, This has been called a “Developer’s Charter” and we expect a number of housing applications over the next few months for Sidmouth.

We are writing to EDDC asking them to revise the LP before it is sent, to change the Knowle and to omit the Sidford Employment Land for the following reasons:

  • We believe that since EDDC itself has rejected the OPA for the Knowle, that it should be changed or removed.
  • We consider that there is absolutely no justification for including Sidford Employment Land. Extensive flooding is prevalent and traffic congestion will be severe. Moreover the size (5 Hectares = approx. 13 acres)  has been determined by erroneous calculations. We believe that we have a very strong case against it.

Meanwhile we continue to put pressure on EDDC, by asking pertinent questions wherever we feel that there is obfuscation.

If anybody needs any further explanation then please contact SOS Chair,  Richard Thurlow, at this SOS website.


1 Comment

Planning issues ARE within the scope of the Business TAFF

After months of being stalled by ‘legal advice’ that  it had no power to investigate planning matters concerning the controversial East Devon Business Forum, the Business TAFF can at last get on with its job.  
At their meeting yesterday,   the Overview and Scrutiny Committee agreed that the scope of the Business Task and Finish Forum with regard to the EDBF should include the consideration of planning issues in respect of employment land, but not in respect of any specific planned allocations and it should not delay the progress of the Local Plan.
The decision, with a ‘named vote’ , was 10 for and 9 against, as follows:

FOR= 10 votes

Graham Troman, Stuart Hughes, David Chapman, Sheila Kerridge,(Conservatives) = 4 votes

 Derek Button, Brenda Taylor, Eileen Wragg, Peter Burrows, (LibDems) = 4 votes

Roger Giles, Claire Wright (Independents)  =2 votes

AGAINST=9 votes

Mike Allen, Peter Bowden,Deborah Constance Baker,Vivien Duval Steer,Tony Howard,John Humphreys,David Key,Tim Wood, Tom Wright (Conservatives) =9 votes

One of the speeches from the public was by Barry Curwen of SOS. He has been promised a written reply. The speech is here:  Question to Overview and Scrutiny Committee 28.03.13

Another speaker from the floor was Dr Margaret  Hall  of the Campaign for Rural England. She pointed out that, as actual population increase had been much less than predicted by the Office of National Statistics (ONS),  far fewer houses than estimated, would in fact be needed.

The Minutes of this O&S Meeting will be well worth reading, particularly regarding issues of the  “Five Year Land Supply” .

For highlights from this meeting, go to http://sidmouthindependentnews.wordpress.com , 29 March post,  Planning planted firmly on the Business TAFF agenda


Leave a comment

Developers’ charter imminent (from next Wednesday, 27 March)

Save our Sidmouth supporters may be interested in this letter sent in to our website mailbox yesterday. It relates to next week’s National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)  deadline, which will have particularly disastrous consequences for East Devon’s villages and towns…including Sidmouth.

Dear all,
Some while ago, I wrote to my MP expressing concern about clauses 1 and 8 in the Growth and Infrastructure bill. The reply from Nick Boles is here:  Doc1
Either Nick Boles has not read the bill, or he supposes that nobody else has! The reply is inadequate, and my response to my MP on clause 1 is attached.    Dear Julian Smith MP_clause1
It hardly matters what local councils do, if Pickles can disenfranchise them on little more than a whim. As it is worded, standing up to developers will be classed as “under performance” and the LPA will be “designated”. Developers will then apply directly to the Secretary of State, who will wave applications through without regard to local knowledge or opinion.
If you have not already lobbied your MP on this one, please do so ASAP. This bill is nearing assent.

Please also refer to http://www.whosehomeisit.co.uk.

Best regards,   
David Walsh