Save Our Sidmouth

Now EDDC obliged to revise its own Outline Planning Application for Knowle, Sidmouth, for the FOURTH time!

1 Comment

In response to this news, SOS has issued the following press release:

‘Save Our Sidmouth, (SOS)…through the research done by one of its constituent members, the Sidmouth Chamber of Commerce… has for the third time queried the supporting economic data prepared by East Devon District Council. This data referred to the number of predicted jobs losses in the town should EDDC re-locate from their HQ building at the Knowle to Honiton. 

The Economic Impact Assessment submitted by the EDDC relocation team was again found to be seriously misleading and inaccurate.    The estimate of job losses arising from the application has now been revised upwards three times and will now reach 75, from the first prediction of 3 job gains. 

This will double the current levels of unemployment in Sidmouth and is a completely unacceptable level of damage to the local economy.   Combined with the loss of parking and parkland, this makes the case for rejecting this ill-judged proposal overwhelming. 

As a result of this, SOS welcomes the decision by the EDDC Planning Team to further delay the consideration of this application. The application will not now be considered in January.   

It is astounding that the Relocation Team at EDDC have had their Economic Impact Assessment rejected three times by their own Planning Department.   It is a complete humiliation for those responsible, and proves beyond doubt that they are incapable of managing a project of this scale.  Confidence in the authority to competently deliver the relocation has accordingly collapsed. 

The only sensible course of action is for EDDC to withdraw the application and reconsider the matter in a calmer way.   The process has descended into farce. ‘

Richard Thurlow (Chair, Save our Sidmouth)

One thought on “Now EDDC obliged to revise its own Outline Planning Application for Knowle, Sidmouth, for the FOURTH time!

  1. Does this mean that the report recommending acceptance has to be redone? Two lots of information it was based on have changed. One is the Economic statement, the other is the Bat survey information which now says that their tree survey has identified that 10 of the trees proposed to be removed are very important and also that light levels need to be maintained or preferably reduced in the area. They mention vegetation as screening to stop car headlights being a problem but how many years will it be before that has grown to a suitable size and the bats will have been driven off by then, there is no mention of street lights, does that mean that there is no intention to have street lighting on any of the new roads?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s